Hi there,

The summer festival ‘Vierdaagsefeesten’ is currently in full flow here in Nijmegen (the city where one of our offices is based). It’s one of Europe’s largest free music festivals, featuring over a thousand performances across forty stages and drawing in 1.5 million visitors over the course of a week. The festivities originated from the Four Days Marches  - a long distance walk - in which both civilians and military personnel trek through the region.

Over the years, the event has grown more modern and sophisticated in its setup. There’s now an app that allows users to curate a personalised list of performances they’d like to attend. Fifteen minutes before each show, they receive a notification, and in some cases, warnings about overcrowded squares or parks. The app nudges users to share events with friends, and its interactive map lets you filter for vegetarian food or water refill stations, among other things.

This isn’t the only festival that’s harnessed the potential of apps to enhance its users’ experiences. Most festivals offer a version of this kind of service. The technology is, clearly, available and the party industry is continuing to innovate how it harnesses it. 

So why aren’t most news apps?

Personalisation on homepages is still struggling to gain traction, and editors often have little control over the hierarchy of news stories.

The Economist recently launched a redesign of its app, introducing a key feature: it looks different during the week than it does at the weekend. On weekdays, shorter news items take centre stage, while weekends offer more space for long-form stories and background features.

It’s a smart move, but I believe news app developers could push things much further. In print newsrooms, editors often spend an entire day debating the layout of the front page. Which stories deserve a teaser with a big photo? Which headline should stand out more? Opinion pieces are styled differently from reports or analyses.

That level of nuance is almost entirely missing from the digital equivalent. Liveblogs sit side by side with news articles, opinion columns and reader comments. On social media, every preview looks exactly the same. It takes a trained eye to discern the differences in user need, tone or editorial style. And let’s be honest: people scroll past sports or lifestyle articles they’ll never read, every single day.

If you want to keep your app users engaged for the long haul, go out and find UX and UI designers who’ve earned their stripes in sectors like the party or events industry. And to those designers: please, give journalism a helping hand.


Useful industry-wide metric benchmarks 

After this pep talk – if I may call it that – let’s bring things back down to earth with a blog about data.

We often get questions from clients wondering whether they’re doing well in certain areas. That’s why our labs team dug into the data from 231 brands to benchmark the following metrics:

  1. Page depth: the average number of articles visited during a reader’s session.
  2. Read depth: a compound metric that shows how far into an article a reader actually gets.
  3. Attention time: the time a user genuinely spends reading the content on a page. We only count ‘engaged time’.

Curious to know what the average (actually, median) looks like among our clients?

The User Needs Growth Hacks

We’ve already heralded the launch of our brand-new guide a few times, but fresh from my holiday, I’d like to highlight it once more: The User Needs Growth Hacks. Perhaps a nice reading suggestion for your own summer break…

It’s the third substantial publication that smartocto has made freely available to media professionals who are interested in the User Needs 2.0 model and/or want to ensure that they put their audience at the centre of their output.

"Understanding the model and saying you already do user needs is one thing, but fully embracing it is another. You need to go all-in to see the results." - Jeremy Clifford, founder/director of Chrysalis

After the whitepaper, Em Kuntze and I created a practical playbook, packed with ideas and examples to help journalists integrate the user needs approach into their daily routines. More recently, we shared findings showing that articles with a clear user needs focus are read more frequently than those without.

It was our AI tool, smartocto.ai, that made that conclusion possible – and it shows how much better we’ve come to understand what works (and what doesn’t) in digital journalism over the past few years. If you're still of the opinion that data tools only exist to boost clickbait, you’ve missed at least a decade of progress. Maybe it’s time to swap scepticism for curiosity.

That curiosity brings us to the third and final part of our work on user needs. The User Needs Growth Hacks rounds off the trilogy and connects strategy, evidence and action.

READING TIPS

  • That AI companies use content hidden behind paywalls was already known. But how exactly do these companies bypass those paywalls when training their models? Henk van Ess reveals the answer in his newsletter.
  • Journalism.co.uk covers an interesting initiative aimed at bridging the gap between traditional quality journalism and the uncontrolled dynamics of social media.
  • You may have noticed it yourself on social media: platforms are overflowing with clips from podcasts. It turns out to be a successful strategy for driving further growth in the podcast phenomenon. Press Gazette reports on Crowd Network, which shows that growth now mainly comes from the smart use of social media, video production, and close collaborations with athletes who are also given ownership.

That brings us to the end of this newsletter. We hope you found it useful once again. Keep sending us your suggestions or comments in a reply – it shows us that what we write is being taken seriously!

See you next time!

Stefan ten Teije, content editor @ smartocto