Declining reader attention might be down to news fatigue. But it also might (and we’ll whisper this) be because of the way the news is being reported. Read to the end for tips to prevent your readers switching off.

Ukraine. Gaza. The second Trump presidency. The rise of the far-right. Global warming.

However awful the latest bombing, failed ceasefire, scientific report, or criminal trial, if the events look similar but your approach to covering it doesn’t change, you can’t expect readers to be in thrall to your latest articles. They certainly won’t be as attentive as they were when you reported that first bombing or failed ceasefire, or scientific report or criminal trial.

That’s just human nature. We respond to ‘different’.

And, this diminished attention can easily look like news fatigue.

People are less interested in the news than they were a decade ago

Craig Robertson, over at Reuters Institute published an article on this subject a few weeks ago, referencing Reuters’ ongoing study into news avoidance. Their charts show a gradual decline in attention, particularly among young people.

The same analysis revealed that those with a degree of interest in the news has declined from 71% to 56% between 2015 and 2024.

While there are various explanations for this - the availability and temptability (yes, we’ll say that’s a word) of other ‘lighter’, more entertainment-centric content being principal - these are statistics the news sector must absolutely pay attention to.

Readers are, whichever way you look at it, switching off from news.

But wait. Are we really all suffering from news fatigue?

Dmitry Shishkin, CEO at Ringier Media International has his own take on this - and it’s rather empowering.

Actually I’m going to challenge the idea of news fatigue. My commitment to using user-centric content modelling and content strategy has been so far that I never understood news avoidance because people only avoid news if you are failing to satisfy their needs somehow.

Portrait of Dmitry Shishkin

Dmitry Shishkin CEO @ Ringier Media International

Interesting.

Is the nuance we’re looking for here that readers are exhausted from a lack of user-centricity at the content planning stage?

Maybe you have been too focused on ‘Update me’ stories.

Maybe you’re not explaining things to readers.

Or, maybe you are explaining things, but not making it obvious that you’re explaining things.

In short? You might not be able to control WHAT you cover, but you absolutely can focus more on HOW you cover it.

As Dmitry says, the common thread with those three problems is that there’s not enough user-centric or character-centricity.

The encouraging thing about this is that this isn’t just a theory. Dmitry’s helped enough newsrooms make the switch to user needs focused planning to know that it can be transformative.

“I see the average read depth or average read number of reads per section go up month after month when editors start applying user needs model to their stories.”

Here’s what Dmitry says you should do about it

When you’re brainstorming an idea about how to cover a particular story, and if it’s not a breaking news situation, I would always recommend that if someone brings you three versions of ‘Educate me’ headline they’re going to write, ask them to bring the 4th 5th and 6th because those extra three ideas may be fresh takes, and not done by anyone already.

-DS

Here’s what Stefan says you should do about it

And, as we have a fair amount of in-house expertise on the matter, we also asked our editor and user needs expert, Stefan ten Teije for his top tips as well.

  1. Bring the news into the reader’s world.

Maybe a product might become more expensive or less available in your country because of a war far away. Use that angle to tell the story of that conflict. Perhaps humanitarian aid is slow to get underway. Find people in your own country who are actively involved in the response.

This isn’t a case of ‘how can I make this about me’, but the user needs methodology can help you to find a more locally relevant entry point for your own community.

2. Don’t assume there’s too much prior knowledge.

One of the common pitfalls for journalists is assuming that the audience has more background knowledge and understanding than it actually does. And, unfortunately, this is true even if you’ve been reporting on a subject for years. People are busy living their own lives, and their knowledge of current affairs is generally at a completely different level to you as a journalist. Start by inviting readers to ask questions, and then try to find original ways to answer them. “Why don’t we put solar panels in the Sahara?” could be a great opening question for a piece on the role of desert landscapes in the climate system.

3. Analyse the read depth of your stories.

Not a surprising tip coming from someone who works at smartocto, perhaps, but as a journalist, you really should try to learn from how readers engage with your work. Where do they drop off? Why might they disengage at that point? You have the ability to think critically, so apply that same mindset when analysing the data behind your own stories.